Find out about the experts, the so-called experts and the critics – what are their credentials, and should we take notice of them?
An Australian biological scientist working for a conservative think tank writes extensively on climate change. But my investigation comes to the same conclusion as other reviewers: her analysis is faulty and misleading.
An academic political scientist becomes a leading climate change critic, but bases much of his comments on cherry picked data that misrepresents the scientific facts.
I examine the efforts of Tony Heller to question climate science, by looking at a number of specific claims. I find his analysis is generally simplistic, inaccurate and biased.
Read how this major anti-science think tank and lobby group has distorted the scientific facts on climate change, and helped set the world back decades.
A review of a minor website with big claims – the world is cooling, not warming; we can confidently predict declining solar radiation and an imminent change in the earth’ magnetic field; and these two events will lead to a catastrophe for anyone not prepared. Unfortunately, some of the facts are wrong (apparently invented in some cases) and the predictions have very little basis.